Photo of Brian Cohen

Brian Cohen is a founding partner of the firm. An accomplished litigator practicing in federal and state courts throughout the country, he has extensive experience in all phases of litigation. Brian has successfully represented a diverse clientele in a broad range of complex business and real estate litigation and class action litigation. Brian is a 1997 graduate of the St. John's University School of Law, where he was a member of the St. John's Law Review.

Brian is admitted to practice law in New York, Connecticut, the United States Supreme Court, United States Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and the District of Connecticut. He is the President of the Westchester County Bar Association.

The New York State Office of Court Administration is seeking public comment on a proposed amendment to the Rules of the Commercial Division that would add a new Rule 25-a authorizing the use of Virtual Evidence Courtrooms (VECs). The proposal, developed by the Commercial Division Advisory Council, is now open for public comment until August 16, 2025.

According to

In a June 6, 2025 decision by Justice Linda S. Jamieson in Moshe Bain v. Samuel Strulovitch, et al., the Westchester County Commercial Division denied two motions to dismiss in a complex dispute concerning ownership interests in a Mount Vernon nursing home and the real estate on which it operates. The litigation centers on

On May 20, 2025, the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts signed Administrative Order 111/25, introducing significant developments for litigators practicing in the Commercial Division. Effective July 7, 2025, the Order adds a new Appendix E – a Model Pre-Trial Order – to Section 202.70 of the Uniform Rules of the Supreme and County Courts

Starting July 7, 2025, a new Rule 23 will take effect in the Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court, authorizing the filing of amicus curiae briefs for the first time in trial-level proceedings. This important development further cements the Commercial Division’s role—both statewide and here in Westchester—as a forward-thinking venue for resolving sophisticated

On January 28, 2025, New York State’s Chief Administrative Judge signed Administrative Order #38-2025, setting in motion significant changes for the Commercial Division’s jurisdiction over cases seeking only equitable or declaratory relief. Here’s what you need to know:

What’s Changing?

Until now, parties seeking treatment in the Commercial Division simply had to certify that their

The New York County Lawyers Association (NYCLA) recently celebrated a major milestone in the legal community, honoring the 30th Anniversary of the Commercial Division of the New York State Supreme Court. The event took place on March 4, 2025, at The Pierre Hotel in Manhattan, bringing together legal luminaries, corporate counsel, and judiciary members, including

In Pantelis P. Mestousis et al. v. Michael Saccente, Justice Gretchen Walsh of the Westchester Commercial Division denied dueling motions for summary judgment in a sprawling dispute over a failed multimillion-dollar quarry acquisition and an alleged $70,000 personal loan. The decision highlights the court’s rigorous application of summary judgment standards, particularly in the context

In Michael Cushner, M.D. v. Summit Health Management LLC, Index No. 65930/2024, Justice Gretchen Walsh of the Westchester Commercial Division issued a detailed Decision and Order addressing a motion to dismiss by defendants Summit Health, VillageMD, and City Medical. Dr. Cushner—a former orthopedic surgeon at WestMed—claims he is owed millions under his employment and

In a recent decision by Westchester Commercial Division Justice Linda S. Jamieson, the Court declined to permit a late-stage amendment to the complaint that sought to introduce new claims against an additional corporate defendant. The case serves as a noteworthy example of the court’s careful application of procedural principles and substantive corporate law doctrines—particularly regarding

Embracing Technology Disputes and Enhancing Efficiency with Referee Appointments

A recently issued Administrative Order by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts (AO/77/24, dated February 14, 2024) brings two important changes to the Commercial Division Rules that will affect case jurisdiction and case management.

Expanded Jurisdiction for Technology-Related Matters

What’s New?

Section 202.70(b)(1) of the